U.S. President Donald Trump complained Thursday that his country¡¯s bilateral security arrangement with Japan, signed in 1960, was one-sided. In response, Japan pointed out the cooperative nature of the agreement.
¡°I love Japan. We have a great relationship with Japan. But we have an interesting deal with Japan where we have to protect them but they don¡¯t have to protect us,¡± Trump told reporters.
¡°That¡¯s the way the deal reads. We have to protect Japan. Under no circumstances do they have to protect us,¡± the president said, adding that Japan was making a fortune off the U.S. economically.
The Japanese government, however, replied that the original security treaty does allow for a joint response for protecting Japan and that subsequent legislation, in 2015, greatly expanded the scope of mutual protection under certain circumstances.
¡°Article 5 of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty stipulates that Japan and the U.S. will respond jointly to armed attacks on Japan. Article 6 allows the U.S. to use Japanese facilities to contribute to Âé¶¹´«Ã½ security and to maintain international peace and security in the Far East,¡± Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said Friday morning in response to Trump¡¯s comments.
¡°In addition, the (2015) Peace and Security Legislation enables Japan and the U.S. to help each other seamlessly in all situations to protect Japan,¡± Hayashi added.
Trump made similar criticisms about Japan during his first presidency. But during last month¡¯s summit with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in Washington, he did not voice such complaints publicly.
Thursday¡¯s remarks about Japan came after Trump said European countries were ripping off the U.S. on its payments to NATO.
They also came after Elbridge Colby, Trump¡¯s nominee for Undersecretary of Defense Policy, gave written testimony to his Senate Armed Services Committee confirmation hearing Tuesday in which he said that, while U.S.-Japan military-to-military relations were solid, they needed to be further deepened. He also said Japan needed to spend more on its defense.
¡°The President has suggested that Taiwan spend 10% (of its GDP) and that European NATO spend 5%. In that context, it makes little sense for Japan, which is directly threatened by China and North Korea, to spend only 2% (of its GDP on defense).
¡°Japan should be spending at least 3% of GDP on defense as soon as possible, and accelerating the revamp of its military to focus on a denial defense of its own archipelago and collective defense in its region,¡± Colby said.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.